| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| SAMLAMBO |
Posted - 11/22/2015 : 06:42:40
Received this model about 6-7 weeks ago which I bought from ebay and was so upset because of the shipping it was damaged and the seller was kind enough to give me a full refund and I keep the model. I felt bad for him and decided to have it fixed so I sent it to Steve Barnett to have it fixed and shipped back to me. When I received it I had Laurent Tay do some minor touch up for me and now I am so glad I own this rare jewel. I am also awaiting my Bosica 156 which I will post up soon. So the 126 and 156 are the only 2 factory Bosica builds I own and to me these 2 models are the holygrail.
They compliment each other very well. I say this because the 126 was Bosica's first or very early factory builds and the 156 is his very first high detailed models? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
 |
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| SAMLAMBO |
Posted - 11/24/2015 : 07:24:30
quote:
Originally posted by PeterW
I imagine it is the engineering aspect compared to the 126-C2, but as I have stated repeatedly the 126-C2 set the standard for high detail kits IMO ;) The 156/85 was his best kit.
Ah ok, the best of both worlds. Thanks Peter :) |
| PeterW |
Posted - 11/23/2015 : 07:19:11
I imagine it is the engineering aspect compared to the 126-C2, but as I have stated repeatedly the 126-C2 set the standard for high detail kits IMO ;) The 156/85 was his best kit. |
| SAMLAMBO |
Posted - 11/23/2015 : 05:04:48
quote:
Originally posted by JAG
Yes, the 126C2 was the first BOSICA Ferrari high detailed kit, I still have mine in the original box.
Thanks. Than why is the 156 the holygrail to many? |
| JAG |
Posted - 11/22/2015 : 18:23:28
Yes, the 126C2 was the first BOSICA Ferrari high detailed kit, I still have mine in the original box. |
